25 Comments:

1. 

   DerBabic / August 23, 2009 8:14 am

   I think the the image that you present the ppl here is not realistic enough. I t wasn’t like “before everything was fine”. I agree that the situation became dramatically worse after the revolution,in fact it was probably like hell to live in Iran around that time, but you should not forget to mention the crimes and the oppression of the shah regime as well if you want to stay objective.
2. 

   lolpower555 / September 2, 2009 3:18 pm

   all lies! the shah allows all American living in the 1990;’s iran to live without being prosecuted! is this fair?
3. 

   PunisherLobo / September 9, 2009 4:16 am

   fucking hyprocate! Google operation ajax you stupid idiot! You are the real enemie of the iranian people!
4. 

   eminem338 / September 18, 2009 6:17 pm

   OMG 2:07 poor woman
5. 

   XoideX / September 21, 2009 1:58 pm

   Nice! Good work!
6. 

   empnero2325 / October 23, 2009 2:21 am

   Well if youre stuck at home anyway you could try making some money online.. to get started use the free lessons from soloemployee . com
7. 

   bemmington / October 23, 2009 5:31 pm

   Wenn du dir deinen blöden kopf ab und zu aus deinem Arsch ziehen würdest, wüsstest Du das so ziemlich alle Leute (die Vernünftigen) die früher “Tod dem Shah”gerufen haben heute Anhänger Reza Pahlavis sind!! Aber Hauptsache ihr linken Wirrköpfe freut euch das die Monarchie weg ist, ist ja völlig egal wenn das ganze Land vor die Hunde geht. Please indulge us, what crimes exactly did the shah commit tell us please!!
8. 

   DerBabic / October 24, 2009 7:13 am

   My reply to your emotional and insulting comment is as follows: Do some research about e.g. “S.A.V.A.K.” and you will immediately see what I mean.
9. 

   bemmington / October 24, 2009 10:06 am

   Oh yeah those are your punchlines aren’t they, SAVAK and tyranny, if SAVAK didn’t exist you leftists would have to invent them. SAVAK went after Tudeh and Mojaheddin people the very people who helped Khoemeini to fuck out country into oblivion, as far as I am concerned SAVAK wasn’t nearly as repressive and harsh as they should have been if Rajavi and Nouri and their idiotic followers were able to roam the streets and make trouble. I wish SAVAK had been 2X as brutal and repressive than they were.
10. 

    bemmington / October 24, 2009 10:09 am

    It saddens me to see that my countrymen after 30 years still have their heads up their asses, while daily dozens are being hanged in the streets, people are being stoned and raped, you idiots still shout SAVAK!!?? With people like you my friend Iran doesn’t need extrernal enemies, Iranians have always been Iran’s biggest enemies, you exemplify this phenomenon perfectly, shäm dich du Trottel.
    JAVID SHAH, JAVID SHAH JAVID SHAH
11. 

    DerBabic / October 24, 2009 11:37 am

    I forgot to mention that I’m not a leftist and neither do I support one of the groups you mentioned above. I am for a free democracy. I don’t care what the groups call themselves or what they stand for (monarchists, leftists, nationalists,islamists etc.), what they all have in common is that they’re against deomocracy and freedom. If you think that violence against politcial opponents is the right way to a better future for the Iraninan Nation than in your eyes I will stay forever an idiot.
12. 

    bemmington / October 24, 2009 2:51 pm

    Don’t worry that train already left!
13. 

    BehzadHamedani / October 26, 2009 9:41 pm

    dastetoun baraye in clip dard nakoneh, bessiar ali boud
14. 

    MedoPersian2769 / October 27, 2009 12:15 am

    May Lord bless the spirit of ”Shah” and put the spirit of ”Khomeini” into eternal death and hell.
    Long Live Free IRAN.
15. 

    227Morgan / October 29, 2009 4:06 am

    Can somebody explain to me what a mullah is?
16. 

    yourbesteyes / November 8, 2009 12:15 am

    A muslim preacher.
17. 

    KaranEtemadzadeh / November 12, 2009 2:31 am

    @ bemmington – my father was one of those Tudeh tortured by your SAVAK ( you know, that agency mostly comprised of Turks and Arabs that the Shah utilized to keep the fear of torture well in the minds of secular Iranians ? ).
    The Shah himself was muslim and declared that all Iranians must choose to be completely for him or against him – otherwise he’d unleash his SAVAK dogs on you.
    You are of the lowest and an enemy to reason and liberty, please see to it you leave this world childless.
18. 

    KaranEtemadzadeh / November 12, 2009 2:38 am

    Both are garbage – is your mind so feeble as to blindly veer toward to the lesser evil ? Where did praise for Mossadeq go ? Who was Shah but a delusional bloodthirsty egomaniac in bed with freemasons and zionists ? And please don’t cite me his latter attempts to wean Iran from western influence as it has no meaning in light of his murderous treatment of Iranians who dared speak out…pathetic
19. 

    KaranEtemadzadeh / November 12, 2009 6:38 am

    shame on you Amavand – I haven’t seen so much propaganda garbage since my last FYROM video, that claims Alexander the great was a slav ! You’ve taken a page right out of Goebbel’s book with your lavish liberties of the truth.
20. 

    bemmington / November 12, 2009 1:07 pm

    Is that so, you know what, my father was a Tudehi too and he also was in jail for eight years for that, he was never manhandled or treated badly just jailed. My father was himself a member of the Tudeh party and i detest him for that. And my biggest criticism about the Shah is that he let people like my father and mother live, I criticise him for not collectively executing every single Tudeh and Mojaheddin member, maybe today’s Iranians would not have to be stoned, gangraped and hanged.
21. 

    bemmington / November 12, 2009 1:19 pm

    Oh speaking of arabs and turks guess who are the people who beat our countrymen and women in the streets under the rule of your beloved Mullahs huh? Tell me pal? Secular Irnians my ass, if you tudeh people were so secular why were your people roaming the streets shouting “Allaho Akbar Khomeini Rahbar” Secular tudehis Pffffffff
22. 

    KaranEtemadzadeh / November 12, 2009 6:11 pm

    What does it have anything to do with the murderous regimen of the Shah ? They are all garbage – Tudeh, Islamists and Monarchists – all that remains for a sensible person is to support democracy , i.e. Mossadeq – has it occured to you ? I wince at idiots like yourself who in a diseased small-mindedness have come to choose the lesser of two evils.
23. 

    KaranEtemadzadeh / November 12, 2009 6:16 pm

    They were gangraped and hanged even in Shah’s time. My father can attest to that in his years of incarceration – and yes he was tortured. What a deluded kook …
24. 

    bemmington / November 13, 2009 1:39 pm

    Look dickhead this is not the first time I’m arguing an anti-sjhah idiot like you. and my common experience is that when you run out of bullshit to spew you go “Mossadegh” + “Democracy”. Mossadegh was never elected by anyone but inducted, guess by whom… yep the Shah made Mossadegh primeminister noone else. There is something else in play, Iran is an imperial Monarchy, has been for 2500 years and your anti-monarchy stance is just a way of concealing that you are anti-Iranians.
25. 

    bemmington / November 13, 2009 1:40 pm

    I guess you are actually proud of that treacherous father of yours, tell him from me that it’s a pity they didn’t kill him and every single Tudeh and Mojahedd memebr at the time!!!